Shareable intelligence
Malawi
4 objects, each built so its context cannot be cropped away. Every one states the
scenario range rather than a single value, carries the confidence level and the date the evidence
was last checked, and links back to the full page it came from.
Copy a card's link to share it. Screenshot one and the qualifications come with it, because they
are inside the frame rather than under it.
Country outlook · Eastern Africa
Malawi
Three scenarios, two horizons. The range is the finding — a single number would imply
knowledge nobody has.
| Measure | Latest observed | 2031 | 2036 |
| Output per person |
$672 2025 |
$639 – $754 | $613 – $831 |
| Electricity access |
16% 2024 |
17% – 19% | 18% – 22% |
| Internet use |
19% 2024 |
24% – 31% | 28% – 38% |
Growth bands: -0.82% · 0.57% · 1.96% a year per person,
from Malawi's own 15-year record (2011–2025) — mean ± 0.85 standard deviations,
clamped to its own 5th–95th percentile. Not an outside estimate of what this country might do.
Who this outlook leaves out
- A cohort that reaches working age faster than jobs, training places or clinics are built
- Rain-fed farming households, first and hardest, in a bad season
- A state that must regulate technologies it has too few trained people to assess
2031 versus 2036 · Malawi
Two horizons, asked the same question
By 2031
- Household electricity access moves from 15.6% of the population (2024) to between 17% and 19% by 2031, depending on the scenario. Simple continuation gives 18% — a rise of 2.5 percentage points.
- In people rather than percentages: about 21.1 million would still be without it in 2031 under continuation — 2.3 million more than in 2024, because the population grows as the share improves.
- Internet use moves from 19% of the population (2024) to between 24% and 31% by 2031, depending on the scenario. Simple continuation gives 27% — a rise of 8 percentage points.
- In people rather than percentages: about 18.8 million would still be without it in 2031 under continuation — 803,792 more than in 2024, because the population grows as the share improves.
- Output per person spans $639 to $754 by 2031. The $115 between them is under a quarter of today's $672.
- That spread is the distance between scenarios, not a margin of error — and it is a national average, which does not identify whose income moved.
- The population reaches about 25.8 million — roughly 3.5 million more people than in 2025, about 15.4 million of them of working age.
- This figure is the same in all three scenarios. Most of the people who will be alive in 2031 have already been born.
By 2036
- Household electricity access moves from 15.6% of the population (2024) to between 18% and 22% by 2036, depending on the scenario. Simple continuation gives 20% — a rise of 4.2 percentage points.
- In people rather than percentages: about 23.1 million would still be without it in 2036 under continuation — 4.4 million more than in 2024, because the population grows as the share improves.
- Internet use moves from 19% of the population (2024) to between 28% and 38% by 2036, depending on the scenario. Simple continuation gives 32% — a rise of 13.3 percentage points.
- In people rather than percentages: about 19.5 million would still be without it in 2036 under continuation — 1.5 million more than in 2024, because the population grows as the share improves.
- Output per person spans $613 to $831 by 2036. The $218 between them is a quarter to a half of today's $672.
- That spread is the distance between scenarios, not a margin of error — and it is a national average, which does not identify whose income moved.
- The population reaches about 28.8 million — roughly 6.6 million more people than in 2025, about 17.7 million of them of working age.
- This figure is the same in all three scenarios. Most of the people who will be alive in 2036 have already been born.
What has to happen first
- The Mpatamanga hydropower project has a combined installed capacity of 358 MW, is scheduled to begin construction in early 2026…. Recorded as funded: it still has to actually break ground before it counts as capacity.
- The project is structured as a public-private partnership between an EDF and SN Power consortium (55%), the Government of Malawi…. Recorded as funded: it still has to actually reach recipients rather than sit in an envelope before it counts as money in motion.
- For the Acceleration band to describe the decade, growth per person has to hold near 2% a year. This country has reached that rate before — its best year in the window was 3.1% — but has not sustained it across the 15-year record the band is drawn from.
What the growth model cannot see · Malawi
Climate exposure & disaster risk
Binding constraint — This, not the growth model, is the operative question.
660,000 new displacements from disasters were recorded in 2023. Freshwater withdrawals stood at 18% of renewable resources (2022). 65% of employment is in agriculture (2025). Climate is not an environmental topic here — it is the household income of most of the workforce, and a bad season is a nationwide wage cut.
Why the band cannot contain it
Climate impact is non-linear and arrives as discrete events. A decade of trailing growth contains the droughts that happened, not the ones now becoming more likely.
What would invalidate the modelled bandA multi-season drought or a major flood event affecting the main producing regions. Discrete climate events are outside any band built from recent averages.
Assessed in words and deliberately not converted into a probability. This platform does not
publish likelihoods it cannot derive from evidence.
AI evidence state · Malawi
7 of 20 dimensions rest on a document or a measurement
3 dimensions have not been examined at all —
which is a statement about this platform's research, not about Malawi.
There is no readiness score here: ranking countries by a weighted sum of twenty evidence states
would manufacture a number nobody measured.
4
Measured
A published measurement exists for this country and has been read.
3
Documented
A policy, law, contract or programme document exists. No measurement of its effect has been found.
4
Inferred
Assessed from adjacent indicators. Nothing AI-specific was found for this country; the reading is circumstantial.
6
Not evident
Searched, and nothing was found. Informative — but the absence of a published record is not proof that nothing exists.
3
Unexamined
This platform has not looked. This is a statement about the research, not about the country.
Full brief for Malawi ·
Open in the atlas ·
Method ·
How to read the labels